BINGO, IMakeMONEY, the fact that it was all sent to the SEC by one or more AVBC investors means if they find enough merit in the accusations, they will be investigating AVBC's involvement as well.
The outcome of any investigation will yeild info beneficial to investors and shrareholders and will have a substantial effect on the stock, IMO.
Post 440 was not revived because it was addressed to some annonymous "Gary", although that does show some imagination on OB's part, it was revived because it is relevant as a response to the voluminous posts by Gary, contained an insightful article on OTCBB stocks, and did not violate any rules. I also note that OB, BOP and MATT agree with me, as they did not delete Gary's responding post today, which was entirely to bash Kbob once again, and IMO with the addition of namecalling and inuendo. To BOP's request for an end to the petty bickering, I only add to request a stop to repeating accusations over and over again without presenting new points or evidence. I am still waiting for some evidence in addition to the original accusations two weeks+ ago. (boring)
As BOP lists all of the other boards he has been to behave in this manner, it is no surprise to me that this one is any different. It appears to me the same individuals surf all those boards. It is human nature and reminiscent of AVBC2, where it was oldblue who complained about these dictator or chairmanship boards, where a member is able to censor certain posts, but others posts that may be infractions are not censored and remain unanswerable by the one being bashed and censored at the same time. Merely entertainment.
Anyway, WOW, a lot of shares traded today! Seems like more than a couple of points in kbob's article are relevant to this stock.
The article stated that most otcbb stocks go to zero. Does anyone have any research they want to share relative to the number or percentage of otc stocks that go to zero vs. those that make it?
Have a good weekend.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
