News Focus
News Focus
icon url

gdb81

10/28/06 6:49 PM

#117498 RE: serfdom #117495

If I were an honest shareholder, and believed this was all true, I'd be thinking takeover on behalf of the common shareholders now. For one thing, where is the other 80% representation in this company in the SEC case?

HSM says they own something like 10 million shares combined, thats a 20-25% stake in the company. The SEC would have to listen to what they had to say, except all they would say is "you guys are frauds on behalf of shorty", not "we request an extension until we can hold an emergency proxy to remove rufus from his position and prepare adequate legal representation"

If the bonds are real, and the shareholders fired rufus for the 10k forgery and the ADP misinformation, CSHD might have a chance here.
icon url

rookiecrd1

10/28/06 6:50 PM

#117499 RE: serfdom #117495

It'a all very puzzling to me - no anger at the corp, no worries...just completely weird.

Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Thats why most people are not showing anger towards the corp. If the court finds it to be a fraud then I'll be angry at the corp, however right now we just have an acusation of fraud which I 99.99% believe is unwarrented.

icon url

rbtree

10/28/06 6:58 PM

#117515 RE: serfdom #117495

Correct, serf...but I'm pretty sure it will trade on the greys...for a short while before it's revoked.