News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Split T

09/08/18 5:27 PM

#536885 RE: AZCowboy #536857

AZ, after reading your post I believe the K's percent should be .00425 base on the P's being .17 divided by 40 equals .00425....makes a significant difference if you hold a substantial amount of K's. Perhaps the distribution is figured differently than what I am thinking.



So, For Every "One Million' Dollars" the WMI-LT is planning on RE-Distributing, ... I believe that;

For Every Released Class 19 "P" Share with a Tracking Marker Showing, Will Pay .17 cents

For Every Released Class 19 "K" Share with a Tracking Marker Showing, Will Pay .0025 cents


For Every Released Class 22 "uq" Share with a Tracking Marker Showing, Will Pay .0002 cents
icon url

hotmeat

09/08/18 6:05 PM

#536889 RE: AZCowboy #536857

That's not correct...smh

The exact figures will vary depending on how many shares were released in each case.


$10B returning would give PQ $1000/share

$1B returning would give PQ $100/share

$100M returning would give PQ $10/share

So obviously $40M returning, based on accurate releasing numbers, would give....

PQ ~$4.23/share

TPS ~4.23/share

KQ ~$0.11/share

UQ ~$0.0084/share


icon url

UncleBo

09/09/18 10:32 AM

#536940 RE: AZCowboy #536857

Yup, the trusts are real...directly from the prospectus


https://www.bamsec.com/filing/95011705003428?cik=1337146



CERTAIN MATTERS RELATING TO CONSERVATORSHIP OR The servicer is chartered as a federal savings
RECEIVERSHIP OF THE SERVICER association and is regulated and supervised by the
Office of Thrift Supervision (the 'OTS'), which is
authorized to appoint the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the 'FDIC')


as conservator or receiver for the servicer if
certain events occur relating to the servicer's
financial condition or the propriety of its
actions. In addition, the FDIC could appoint itself
as conservator or receiver for the servicer.

If the FDIC were appointed as receiver or
conservator for the servicer, then regardless of
the terms of the pooling agreement, the FDIC (i)
could prevent the appointment of a successor
servicer, (ii) could authorize the servicer to stop
servicing the mortgage loans, or (iii) could
increase the amount or the priority of the
servicing fee due to the servicer or otherwise
alter the terms under which the servicer services
the mortgage loans. If any of these events were to
occur, payments on the certificates could be
delayed or reduced.


The administrative expenses of a conservator or
receiver for the servicer that the conservator or
receiver determines to be related to the mortgage
loans or the pooling agreement could be paid from
collections on the mortgage loans before the Trust
or the holders of the certificates receive any
payments, thereby resulting in delays or reductions
in payments on the certificates.


The Trust may not have a perfected interest in
collections on the mortgage loans held by the
servicer, and thus if an insolvency proceeding were
commenced by or against the servicer, payments on
the certificates could be delayed or reduced.




<Caption>
CLASS 2-CB-4 CLASS 2-CB-5
DISTRIBUTION ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
DATE 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200%
- ---- ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Initial Percentage...... 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
August 25, 2006......... 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
August 25, 2007......... 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
August 25, 2008......... 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 91
August 25, 2009......... 100 100 100 3 0 100 100 100 100 0
August 25, 2010......... 100 100 77 0 0 100 100 100 28 0
August 25, 2011......... 100 100 21 0 0 100 100 100 0 0
August 25, 2012......... 100 67 0 0 0 100 100 81 0 0
August 25, 2013......... 100 27 0 0 0 100 100 55 0 0
August 25, 2014......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 94 40 0 0
August 25, 2015......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 67 31 0 0
August 25, 2016......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 41 24 0 0
August 25, 2017......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 30 19 0 0
August 25, 2018......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 24 15 0 0
August 25, 2019......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 19 11 0 0
August 25, 2020......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 15 9 0 0
August 25, 2021......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 12 7 0 0
August 25, 2022......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 9 5 0 0
August 25, 2023......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 7 4 0 0
August 25, 2024......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 5 3 0 0
August 25, 2025......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 4 2 0 0
August 25, 2026......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 3 2 0 0
August 25, 2027......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 2 1 0 0
August 25, 2028......... 100 0 0 0 0 100 2 1 0 0
August 25, 2029......... 65 0 0 0 0 100 1 1 0 0
August 25, 2030......... 20 0 0 0 0 100 1 * 0 0
August 25, 2031......... 0 0 0 0 0 72 1 * 0 0
August 25, 2032......... 0 0 0 0 0 20 * * 0 0
August 25, 2033......... 0 0 0 0 0 * * * 0 0
August 25, 2034......... 0 0 0 0 0 * * * 0 0
August 25, 2035......... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weighted Average Life
(in years)(1).......... 24.37 7.50 5.53 3.57 2.61 26.47 11.91 9.69 4.77 3.43
</Table>

icon url

StillHoping

09/10/18 9:35 PM

#537235 RE: AZCowboy #536857

AZ,
You posted the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
So, For Every "One Million' Dollars" the WMI-LT is planning on RE-Distributing, ... I believe that;

For Every Released Class 19 "P" Share with a Tracking Marker Showing, Will Pay .17 cents

For Every Released Class 19 "K" Share with a Tracking Marker Showing, Will Pay .0025 cents

For Every Released Class 22 "uq" Share with a Tracking Marker Showing, Will Pay .0002 cents
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Did you mean .17 cents of is it 17 cents?

Shouldn't the amount paid for P be 40 times what they pay for K?

Thanks.