Replies to post #288095 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[Tearex]

fuagf, your insight into who and what is racism is flawed. Example in your reference post to conix......https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143284753
Your criticism of sanctuary cities lends validity to others seeing you as anti-immigrant. ---- You say anti-immigrant as if that is against a race. The problem with your hypothesis is that sanctuary cities protect ILLEGAL aliens, not a race.
It seems fairly obvious that conix opposes law breaking entry and stay into the country. Yet, it is you and others that ASSIGN racism to that, when in fact Race has nothing to do with the opposition of illegal entry and stay.

Let me just share a couple first hand employed immigration issues with you.

Canadian Immigrant - comes here on work visa, work visa expires. Immigrant leaves back to Canada...why? Because he wants to stay in "legal" status so they can integrate into society, after they have waited in line to immigrate legally, as to be eligible for future citizenship.

Brazilian Immigrant - comes here on work visa, work visa expires. Immigrant leaves back to Brazil...why? Because he wants to stay in "legal" status. Louis, actually has American citizen children. I ask Louis about going back to Brazil and leaving his children here. He says, his whole adult life has been centered around obtaining American citizenship, and he does not want to break laws and risk his legal status for future citizenship immigration status. He also explains that for him, he has maintain legal status for visiting purposes, as he can not just illegally cross when ever he wants, because he enters and leaves through airports.

Illegal Immigrant from Central America - comes here on work visa, work visa expires. Illegal Immigrant says screw you, I'm staying. I'll come and go as I please, and I'll hide out in one of the many non-integrated
illegal alien communities (sanctuary city), and many other places around the country.

Meanwhile, Louis sits back in Brazil waiting patiently, while other skip the line "illegally" in front of him.

We did not turn this into an issue of race. You did!
conix and I are for legal immigration. Don't twist it and defame us, for your political expediency!

[Tearex]

Thank you for posting that PM. I do remember that. Although for full context, we would need to see what it was in response to. Which, I'm not asking for, or complaining that it's not provided.
I fully accept your prerogative to delete.

Note, that it was not a public complaint.
However your public reference to it as "unwarranted" is false, as F6 admits to deleting 3 of my intellectually superior post.