Correlation does not equal causation, that’s correct. But, without the ability to run any reversal design experiments (A-B-A-B), we would use multiple A-B experiments and look for patterns over time to show that there is, in fact, a contingency between Steve’s Tweets and the drop in price. In this case, there is both contingency and contiguity, leading an observer to infer that the Tweets are related to the drop in share price.
We’ve confirmed a few things- 1) our device is for sale at 1 dealership and that 1 person has bought it. (Confirmed revenue = $135) 2) the item is not selling at Capoli and the owner has turned to creating an eBay account in order to get rid of the product sitting on his shelves. 3) No other dealership is known to be selling our product.
Every quarter we here “wait for the financials”, but the same nonsense is spewed and the price either stays the same or drops further. Or, Steve will pump it again and then use the momentum to sell shares and stuff his pockets with investor’s money. We don’t need more speculation- we need facts. Phantom has compiled the list of Steve’s lies and failures and those are the REAL reasons that the price is in the gutter. Steve lies at every turn and new investors have learned not to believe him.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
