Replies to post #29503 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[sarals]

Phil,

Although I didn't agree with the content, it had nothing to do with me limiting anyone from posting book length copy and pastes. (before anyone brings up Gary's infraction, which he later deleted himself, I didn't realize he had posted an entire article) I also deleted AK's full length article the other day that I agreed with. Matt restored it, I think because of Gary's now infamous post.

That just goes to show that the focus is on who you are watching to delete and not the rule.

case closed.

[AKvetch]

I didn't realize he had posted an entire article) I also deleted AK's full length article the other day that I agreed with.

Phil, ONEBGG posted his full-length article; my post was next. It would have been hard for you to miss that. You have chosen to not reply to my public post on that subject. Despite ONEBGG having "violated" the rule on YOUR board numerous times, you cannot ignore the fact that he is your ASST. moderator, and consistenty "makes errors" in that role.

As I've posted to you before, you and ONEBGG have different standards for yourselves and for those you don't care for. To carry this one step further, K2 deleted a post of mine on NOLIB as a personal attack on ONEBGG, and ONEBGG literally had to restore it before Matt could. I've noticed K2 has not participated in this public debate on Q&A. I would guess there is a good reason not to expose herself as you have. THIS is the game playing that is consuming Matt's time. But surely he knows that--he seemingly still doesn't know what to do about it.

The TOU DOES talk about moderators abusing their privileges, as I've referenced before. It truly is a shame, after all the posts and admissions you've made here today, that you cannot see how the shoe fits on you.

JMO.

AK