Replies to post #24522 on The Jailhouse (JAIL)

[chwdrhed]

On the one hand what you say is true. I did initially allow a poster to say that your post sucks. When you applied the same descriptions to a variety of posts you made your point and I capitulated.

However, what cannot be denied is your posting style is extremely combative and aggressive. You don't show up for days then in a flurry of antagonistic posts you reply to posts that are in some cases days old. With topics that the board has moved away from long ago. In a nutshell, you cause trouble.

I do not have a problem with a contrary view. Many on that board post views that are less then enthusiastic. But they do it in a manner that is not intended to get under the skin of everyone else. They simply present their view. You, on the other hand, seem unable to present your view without making others feel stupid and baiting them into an argument.

[Mattu]

This isn't politely doing anything.

Just the headers of a few of your removed messages.


9/10/2003 12:26:44 PM - Your reading comprehension sucks too. He was talking
9/10/2003 12:23:56 PM - Your reasoning sucks. There is no way that
9/10/2003 12:20:43 PM - Your reading comprehension sucks. It is pretty clear
9/10/2003 12:13:06 PM - Your logic is idiotic and juvenile. You seem
9/10/2003 11:41:34 AM - <i"Your reasoning sucks.'

I don't really care who said you could say "Suck" (if anybody did). I didn't say it, therefore, it isn't a rule.

Grow up, talk about the stock, and not about the people. Attack the message, not the messenger.

I'm still not convinced I haven't terminated you numerous times before. I'm going to run another check on that.

Hang out in here for a while.