Replies to post #134100 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[gwikley]

Again:

Assumptions:
1.Completed audits were recieved last week.
2.That it took 10 minutes to read
3.That the anomaly was discovered on first "10 minute reading"
4.That because it could have taken such a short amount of time:
5. The correction would have taken an equally short amount of time.


Therefore there MUST be a bigger problem.

Percieved faults in logic:
1. Time hypothesized to read something you have never seen.
2. That the "discovery" was made in the first "reading".
3. That the audit was read by just one person or one group of persons at just one sitting. With no further discussion.
4. That the percieved anomaly was of such a nature that it could be corrected in an equally short span of time.
5. There are those in the reciprocating office that agree and are willing and available to concure and adjust, within your time frame.


You COULD very well be right. I just present the opposite to your argument.....that I would remind you IS JUST as valid.
Attempting to form a logical argument without data leads to critical errors. Those errors in reasoning are ACCEPTED as conjured FACT because of an emotional motivation..

And as my friend Spock would say......that, Scotty, is illogical.