Replies to post #134071 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[Fishforbreakfast]

Hello, Lakedweller. Maybe some truth to your observation.. I get tired of those calling this a Scam.. I undestand ones concerns and frustrations over delays.. I am not happy with the delays.

However it just ticks me off when some just atomatically say it s a scam because of another un welcome delay.. Get mad that' ok. Sell out of frustration I understand that. Sell to buy another stoc I can live with that. Bash to try and buy in lower. I do not do it myself but I accept it..

It still amazes me with all the DD that has been posted and what we do know about Sulja Brothers etc. CCM. Petar V. There ar3 some still willing to call this a scam. In my opinion that is just plain stupid. I do not feel anyone will take me up on my Escrow offer..

Ya, something happened. Numbers etc. Translation.. Something. Now we have to sit back and wait.. In the long run as more and more traders and flippers get replaced by stonger minded investors the PPS will be much better of in the long run.

When the AF come out and if the shares are in strong hands my shares will go up in value as those who are short will have to pair a fiar price in order to get stronger hands to sell them the shares they are going to need..

I will be buying additional shares tomorrow. FFB-Fish

[gwikley]

Lake, you build an hypothesis:

Company has audit. Though company claims a misinterpretation or language problem, you assume NOT. Because:
A. All persons able to perform the audit, in that region where the audit is being done, are highly fluent in English and USA/CANADIAN accounting terminology. This audit was done with that caliber of language interpretation/translation. AND NO LANGUAGE MISTAKES were made.
B:Therefore; Audits must show company in a bad light. Reason:
C: All companies with good or normal audits publish them
D: All companies with bad or negative audits stall them.

Seems to me a bit of a hypothetical stretch.
1. No inappropriate translation/interpretation was made.
2. All companies with good or normal audits release on time.
3. All companies with bad or negative audits stall them.
4. Therefore this company has a bad audit and is stalling it.

Presumes an apriori knowledge of something you have never seen, as well as a statistical sample of the presentation rates of good or normal audits over a representation period of time, and a statistical sample of bad or negative audit presentation rates for that same time period. None of which accompany your hypothesis.