ForReal, see - rooster, you know Trump does not own America's current economic performance.
You present a compelling case to those that don't understand the nuances of the figures you have provided.
1.) Obama started with the stock market having hit its lowest inaugural performance in history. As most investors know, the recovery was partially attributed to a normal bounce effect. Obama gets no credit for a naturally occurring market phenomena.
2.) Think of the % gain Obama enjoyed in this way. It is easier to gain 100% when all you have is a penny. The continuous exponential gains (that Trump gets credit for) are much more difficult to achieve.
3.) This applies also to today's GDP growth report. The wealth of the country was severely diminished when the stock market crash occurred. Yet, GDP growth under Obama was miniscule, in spite of the wealth growth attributed to a recovering stock market. The GDP increase reported today is 4.1%. That is a 4.1% of a stock market at near historical highs and GDP growth in each preceding quarter. (Think the penny scenario analogy previously used).
So yes, Obama gets credit for growth during his term. But he began at levels that were already programmed for a recovery with little or no guidance from Obama economic policies. In fact, some economists say some of his economic policies and regulations caused a stunted growth. In other words, the economy grew in spite of Obama, not because of him.