nlightn, I think, Stone, is one who said he won't swing, but... wouldn't surprise if Mueller has enough on him.
Now, not in relation at all to either of the stories you have so far posted from the Palmer Report as the 1st re Manafort screwing .. .. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142184813 .. himself again was spot on, and the 2nd, on the evidence so far is more than plausible. Just be cautious.
---- Criticism
The Atlantic's McKay Coppins called the Palmer Report "the publication of record for anti-Trump conspiracy nuts who don’t care about the credibility of the record."[6] The New Republic's Colin Dickey claims that Palmer "routinely blasts out stories that sound serious but are actually based on a single, unverified source," such as the time when he reported Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts had ordered Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch to recuse himself from all Trump-related Russia hearings, with his only sourcing coming from a "single tweet from an anonymous Twitter account under the name 'Puesto Loco.'"[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmer_Report#Criticism ----
The place rang a tiny alarm bell when you posted your 1st one, so had a peek then.
Stone still maintains Guccifer 2.0 is independent of Russian intelligence.
Roger Stone says he’s the 'US person' mentioned in Mueller indictment
By Ali Dukakis Jul 14, 2018, 6:28 AM ET
[...]
When asked by ABC News in June whether he believed that Guccifer 2.0 was an operative of the Russian military intelligence, Stone denied it.
Former FBI Director Robert Mueller at an installation ceremony at FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C., October 28, 2013.
“I've written a 5,000 word piece you can see it stone cold truth that argues against that,” Stone told ABC News in an interview last month. “But even if he was, my communication with him is ex post facto it happens weeks after the WikiLeaks have already published the Democratic National Committee emails and therefore collusion would have to be, would have to be chronological.”