News Focus
News Focus
icon url

onthegreen

05/18/18 9:59 AM

#88803 RE: jerseyfish #88802

ONLY STORY FOR RMHB IS NONSTOP DILUTION. BILLIONS SOLD
icon url

Tom1003

05/18/18 10:38 AM

#88804 RE: jerseyfish #88802

More important from the 10Q released today sales = $50,909. Loss from operations $1,166,421
icon url

seekingafortune

05/18/18 11:31 AM

#88806 RE: jerseyfish #88802

What about the other lawsuits Jerry’s filed alleging misconduct by Mr Seebugar
icon url

bradenhead

05/18/18 11:38 AM

#88807 RE: jerseyfish #88802

Just as I have detailed in several analyses (which are always deleted on the other board), the coup d'etat, which was spuriously executed by Welch and cohorts without a shareholder vote, is disclosed in the current 10Q filing.

41. The increase of authorized common shares to 4 billion in October 2017, was even more
hazardous and ill-considered, and equally self-dealing. Nevada Revised Statutes Section
78.3791 requires any issuance of a controlling interest in a Nevada corporation be approved by
the affected shareholders on a class-by-class basis. No such approval was obtained from either
the Series A or the common shareholders prior to the Company’s issuance to Welch of a newly-
created class of preferred shares that provided him a controlling interest, albeit temporary,
sufficient to increase the number of authorized common shares from 950 million to 4 billion.
Any post-increase assertion that the Series E was somehow intended to “protect the interests of
the Company and its shareholders” (see, NRS 78.378(3)) is specious and groundless, especially
since it essentially created new rights for Welch, designed to usurp the democracy rights of the
other shareholders, rather than “granting or denying” rights or privileges to an existing holder.
By directing this hazardous and ill-considered transaction, the Defendants subjected the
Company to risk of damages and a negative impact on the market for all its shares in the event of
an issuance in excess of 950 million were deemed void, all for their own personal benefit, and
thus breached their duty of care and loyalty.



If you have previously failed to question the integrity of the current management team, this should be a real eye opener.