News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BrokeAgent

05/07/18 6:38 PM

#121310 RE: CA$H I$ KING #121307

There are different payment plans.
icon url

Imott

05/07/18 6:42 PM

#121312 RE: CA$H I$ KING #121307

Knowing JF as the King of Mediocrity, he probably doesn't even pay enough hosting to support 1,000 simultaneous viewers. http://www.tikilive.com/hosting
icon url

NorthTrail

05/07/18 10:49 PM

#121321 RE: CA$H I$ KING #121307

He was giving 1st month free then.
icon url

BrokeAgent

05/07/18 11:36 PM

#121324 RE: CA$H I$ KING #121307

Not if those subs got the first month free or chose the $21.95 package, which I believe was $15.95 in the beginning.
icon url

ChampionOfTheSun

05/08/18 8:59 AM

#121340 RE: CA$H I$ KING #121307

Well lets do simple research. You shouldnt be using 34.95 gross revenue when recalculating if tiki gets a cut right off the top (nor use a completely wrong $39 estimate as reflected in that math).

We should use net revenue, which subtracts their cut. Further, as you can see, cost of goods sold is not a listed line item further solidifying the use of net revenue in this presentation.

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/102714/what-are-difference-between-gross-revenue-reporting-and-net-revenue-reporting.asp

Also, that 1100 figure was not in oct. The last update from october was 650. If we averaged 400 subs and $20 net revenue, then that would be $24k (the amount reported for q4)... a few other ways this can be approximated closely depending the extent estimates for promotional months are involved, other packages, or total net revenue estimates vary.