Replies to post #57737 on Sigma Labs Inc (SASI)

[El_Jefe42]

Seems like some folks can't see the forest for the trees!

Once 20160184893 gets its patent issued, it would be nice for SGLB to issue a press release that explains in laymen (investors) terms what exactly the patent protects. I know the company has been apprehensive to issue overly frivolous PRs in order not to seem like they are pumping the stock. However, seems to me that this patent will be significant to the entire AM industry and the investing community needs to be aware that SGLB stockholders own a very significant asset.

So what did Honeywell do based on their thorough understanding of the program results? They had the newer version of INSPECT 2.0 installed in their facilities in August 2017 as they continued to work on the DARPA III program with SigmaLabs.

[kanya]

>>>"I also still wait for any statements of Honeywell as they where participating that evaluation, where is our old friend Don?"

So the 4027 project end date was March of 2017 and the 2 page summary was finally released in July. Honeywell engineers would not have just read the 2 page summary, they would have seen the actual test results and read the complete report that was not released to the public. This report would have been dozens, if not hundreds of pages long and would allow the experts to understand the limitations that were identified with old version of PrintRite.

So what did Honeywell do based on their thorough understanding of the program results? They had the newer version of INSPECT 2.0 installed in their facilities in August 2017 as they continued to work on the DARPA III program with SigmaLabs. <<<

...so there is a competition between GE and Honeywell...

...GE uses the old version

...Honeywell uses the new version

How stupid is this?