News Focus
News Focus
icon url

shipbuilder

03/18/18 11:36 PM

#325705 RE: swg_tdr #325704

What do we do about the deception. SK et al deserve justice.
icon url

biopharm

03/19/18 6:54 AM

#325707 RE: swg_tdr #325704

Maybe the flaw was in not being able to read the details of the biomarkerS being collected across all studies including Sunrise

How many more Biomarkers were realized?

I doubt Epiontis and Precision For Medicine just came along and had a fortune of good luck without requiring IP data knowledge from Peregrine ....

Why didn't the new BODs want to scratch under all those German links? They must have been promised something
icon url

Protector

03/22/18 11:45 AM

#325748 RE: swg_tdr #325704

swg_trd, we knew that all along.

Check my posts I even mentioned the parties (some of them) that have the other part. As I explained at the time the Exosome Kit must fit one of the form factors of the vendors of the devices that perform the fluid processing.

That is an important, BUT EXISTING, part on which THEY compete. Mainly pre-conditioning and aligning the fluid in order to be able to better count, identify, etc molecules.

So INDEED the Kit is NOT a stand-alone system but MANY competing systems exist to fill in the other part. Those vendors WANT as many Kits as possible available for their standard because that makes the sell their equipment.

I posted links at the time to such equipment. The Kit of PPHM/CDMO has value by what it does, the way it does it and the high accurate way it does it (low # of false positives/negative and fast, cheap processing without centrifugal need).

Also the depth (cancer/no cancer, what cancer, stage of cancer, etc) are the features the market is waiting for.

AIMO