Replies to post #6790 on CyberKey Solutions fka CKYS

[jking1999]

cthulla: Yes, it could. It's never good to have to change a company name or product names, when you are trying to make your imprint on the market you are trying to sell to.

Hopefully Vitex either won't care, or has an agreement that allows CyberKey Solutions to use the Cyberkey term.

[User-65225]

WTF? This is NOT the same company. CKYS doesn't make door locks. lol

[fishman444]

Look more closely, "CyberKey" is not the same as "CyberKeys". In addition, CyberKey Solutions use Cyberkey as a descriptor, that is "Cyberkey ..." which has a totally different mean from "CyberKeys". The protection offered to "CyberKeys" cannot prevent people from using "Cyberkey ... ".

Do you need to take some lesson in English?

[BuzzOnDaBeach]

There are apparently multiple Cyberkey trademarks, three different registrants, including CKYS:

Word Mark CYBERKEY
Goods and Services IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: USB mass storage flash drive. FIRST USE: 20010908. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20010908
Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
Design Search Code
Serial Number 76470685
Filing Date November 29, 2002
Current Filing Basis 1A
Original Filing Basis 1A
Published for Opposition July 6, 2004
Registration Number 2888317
Registration Date September 28, 2004
Owner (REGISTRANT) CyberKey Corporation CORPORATION NEVADA 626 Sugar Leo Circle St. George UTAH 84790
Attorney of Record Michael F. Krieger
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE


http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=eo0ndn.2.3


I'm no expert on trademark registration, but I believe multiple trademarks for different applications are allowed.

Buzz