Bigspirit1: I am familiar with PRHL and have followed it for several years. I was and I still am convinced PRHL is for real and has an excellent business plan. The pot holes in the past for PRHL were not RL's doing (Lexington) and that was a costly error. Remember, RL finances companies with equity and not debt. That is a major factor in my estimation and one not many CEO's do as successfully as RL. If PRHL doesn't announce a major completed project soon, I will start to change my mind. I have watched the players that have been announced in the past and the general goal PRHL has in mind. If RL pulls off what has been announced in the past, I will give RL all the credit he deserves. If not I will be the first in line to criticize his management of PRHL. I am vaguely familiar with one other company RL managed and the medical product that company produces is widely accepted and used. I know nothing about the financials of that company. It is dangerous to cross compare different companies with the same management because we don't know the driving forces and in depth business plan of each. I know PRHL and I stand behind my opinion of PRHL, no other company. The SEC's complaint about PRHL's Note is without merit. The Note no longer exists and nobody was hurt or fooled so where is the problem. The SEC is absolutely out to get the auditors for sure but I don't see PRHL with any culpability.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
