News Focus
News Focus
icon url

dilt1

08/29/03 1:55 PM

#16261 RE: austin01 #16260

Austin - You're asking tough questions to other investors who have no exacting knowledge of what the company has, or is, doing specifically thus you can only get opinions. Ask all the tough questions you like of fellow shareholders and you'll only get opinions and/or guesses back.

Its indeed good you have the gall to ask tough questions of investors on a chat board, keep on doing it. It would be better if you had the balls to ask the company directly or go to the annual meeting where you will get a response thats on the record. You may not like the response but you'll get one. Feel free to share any such responses with us.

Use one of the 10-10-xxx numbers and for 5 cents a minute you can talk till you're blue in the face.

Bottom line - you're asking tough questions "about" the company, you're not asking "questions of the company" that you're invested in.




icon url

mayu

08/29/03 1:59 PM

#16263 RE: austin01 #16260

Austin, when I go to a doctor and start demanding my questions answered they no longer want me as a patient.


Your demand for questions to be answered on your time creates more problems than are necessary. I believe they will answer all your questions when the time is right.

I am saying this to you as an example: There is a time and place for the questions to be answered.
icon url

427Cobra

08/30/03 12:30 AM

#16273 RE: austin01 #16260

Austin: You are not just questioning the company, as you put it. You said. "Does NVEI really expect us to "just take their word for it" that testing went well, without having these companies ACTUALLY validate it? Unbelievable!!! No wonder the share price remains in the "doldrums" after another "upbeat" shareholders' meeting.
Knock, Knock, NVEI, it's called "credibility" and you need it, regarding the tech.

This seems to me that you are saying they don't know what they are doing. If you were just asking the tough questions as you say, then you would ask NV why they haven't announced the names of the two companies instead of saying that IT IS UNBELIEVABLE THAT THEY EXPECT US TO TAKE THEIR WORD FOR IT THAT THE TESTING WENT WELL. If the companies won't let their names be used (which is the norm) then the only option is for them to give you their word. As I said before, why would you want to own stock in a company who's leaders you don't trust?