News Focus
News Focus
icon url

easymoney101

10/04/06 8:19 AM

#42806 RE: F6 #42799

looks like they got the October surprise(S) handed to them ha
icon url

F6

10/06/06 1:06 AM

#42893 RE: F6 #42799

Warner Downbeat After Iraq Trip


Sen. John Warner (R-Va.) speaks to reporters in Baghdad with Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich), left, and Iraqi President Jalal Talabani. Later, he said the U.S. approach may have to be reassessed if the Iraq situation doesn't improve.
Photo Credit: Pool Photo By Ali Jasim Photo


U.S. at Risk of Losing Bid to Control Baghdad, Senator Says

By Josh White
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, October 6, 2006; Page A03

The Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee yesterday offered a stark assessment of the situation in Iraq after a trip there this week, saying that parts of the country have taken "steps backwards" and that the United States is at risk of losing the campaign to control an increasingly violent Baghdad.

Sen. John W. Warner [ http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/w000154/ ] (Va.) told reporters on Capitol Hill that the Iraqi government is having trouble making strides and is incapable of providing even basic human necessities to people in certain areas of the country. Though Warner praised U.S. efforts to keep Iraq under control, he was far less optimistic about the situation there than he had been over the past three years.

Echoing the sentiments of several leading Democrats on his committee, Warner said he believes the United States may have to reevaluate its approach in Iraq if the situation does not improve dramatically over the next several months.

"I assure you, in two or three months, if this thing hasn't come to fruition and if this level of violence is not under control and this government able to function, I think it's a responsibility of our government internally to determine: Is there a change of course that we should take?" Warner said. "And I wouldn't take off the table any option at this time."

Warner and other senators traveled to Jordan, Iraq and Israel this week to discuss the security situation and to evaluate the progress of the Iraqi government. He said U.S. military commanders believe there is no way to reduce the number of U.S. troops in the region in the foreseeable future because of a steady increase in the level of violence, and he added that it is important to acknowledge the civil insurrection, sectarian violence, "unacceptable level" of killings and "heavy casualties" among U.S. forces there.

Sen. Carl M. Levin [ http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/l000261/ ] (Mich.), the committee's ranking Democrat, who was on the same trip, called yesterday for a change in dynamic in Iraq if the government continues to falter in the coming months.

Warner blamed the Iraqi leaders for failing to improve conditions. "You do not see them taking the levers of sovereignty and pulling and pushing them and doing what is necessary to bring about a situation in Iraq whereby the people are able to live, have sufficient food and fresh water, and have a sense of confidence in their government that they're going forward," Warner said.

But he said the situation is not beyond repair. "We're not going to give up hope yet. Let's give it more time to work."

Warner acknowledged that, before the invasion of Iraq, there was a lack of understanding among members of Congress about how much it would take to give Iraq full sovereignty. He blamed himself for not aggressively asking such questions before the war.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company (emphasis added)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/05/AR2006100501645.html

[F6 note -- see also in particular (items linked in):
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13824367 ;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13765702 ; and
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13765655 and preceding and following]

icon url

F6

10/07/06 6:34 PM

#42964 RE: F6 #42799

TIME Poll: The Foley Scandal Has Hurt the G.O.P.


President Bush walks with U.S. Rep. Mark Foley after Florida was hit by Hurricane Charlie in this August, 2004 photo.
LARRY DOWNING / REUTERS


Two-thirds of those aware of the scandal believe Republican leaders attempted a cover-up, according to a new survey

Posted Thursday, Oct. 05, 2006

Two-thirds of Americans aware of the lurid e-mails set to congressional pages by a G.O.P congressman believe Republican leaders tried to cover up the scandal — and one quarter of them say the affair makes them less likely to vote for Republican candidates in their districts come November. Those are among the findings of a new TIME poll conducted this week among 1,002 randomly-selected voting-age Americans.

The poll suggests the Foley affair may have dented Republican hopes of retaining control of Congress in November. Among the registered voters who were polled, 54% said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic candidate for Congress, compared with 39% who favored the Republican. That margin may be fueled by the rolling scandal over sexually explicit e-mails sent to teenage pages by Republican Representative Mark Foley. Almost 80% of respondents were aware of the scandal, and only 16% approve of the Republicans' handling of it. Those polled were divided, however, on whether House Speaker Dennis Hastert should resign over his handling of the Foley affair, with 39% saying he should resign and 38% saying he should not.

Iraq, meanwhile, is continuing to be a problem for the Republicans. Only 38% of respondents in the TIME poll now support President Bush's decision to invade Iraq, down from 42% three months ago. A similar number believe that the new Iraqi government will succeed in forming a stable democracy, while 59% believe this is unlikely. Almost two-thirds (65%) of respondents disapprove of President Bush's handling of the war, while 54% believe he "deliberately misled" Americans in making his case for war — a figure that has increased by 6 points over the past year. President Bush's overall approval rating, according to TIME's poll, now stands at just 36%, down from 38% in August.

Copyright © 2006 Time Inc.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1543199,00.html

[F6 note -- in addition to (items linked in) posts preceding and following this one, see also (items linked in):
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13858037 and preceding and following;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13851104 (nice pic!) and preceding and following;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13850354 (. . .) and following;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13835040 ;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13828375 and preceding and following;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13824367 ;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13821298 ;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13820255 and preceding;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13817938 (. . .) and following;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13817918 (. . .);
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13816337 (. . .) and following;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13776801 and preceding;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13765619 and following;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13760207 and following;
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13752119 ; and
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=13750299 and following]