News Focus
News Focus
icon url

CPR1975

01/08/18 6:51 PM

#29153 RE: nep2134 #29151

This is getting interesting. Look at the new objection date 1-29-2018. Does this mean that the sell of the IP will be postponed?
icon url

CPR1975

01/08/18 6:55 PM

#29154 RE: nep2134 #29151

Would Linda Richenderfer be able to legally explain what Objection to Claim 22 is?
icon url

4mark and you

01/08/18 7:51 PM

#29155 RE: nep2134 #29151

Strange that only now G. Miller has an objection to the claim of J McKeon ? As claims had to be filed by 02/2017 he had plenty of time to object before .
If J McKeon fights it and wins , it won't do us any good as he is one of the creditors .
And what good will it do McKeon as there is only 235K of which first the court and Miller will fill their pockets .
I mean i don't see any money left for the creditors .

By the way McKeon's refusal to lend RCPI the full amount agreed upon by contract was one of the reasons we got into trouble !
Never understood why Mullan didn't fight it and force him to honor the agreement ?
icon url

nep2134

01/08/18 8:11 PM

#29156 RE: nep2134 #29151

Ok, after looking thru todays filings nothing has changed. Deadline for objecting is still tomorrow at 4pm.

Claim 22 was McKeon claiming he was owed $500,000 and it was secured. He never presented any proof and Miller is just asking for it to be dismissed. McKeon dosen't appear to be going to do anything unless he files a last second objection.

Whole thing is just a big mess.