News Focus
News Focus
icon url

#104715 RE: EOT #104714

$NSAV GEEZ, if_TEN_MILLION ain't_the magic-number ! ! !
icon url

EOT

12/21/17 9:30 PM

#104716 RE: EOT #104714

A company as big as Lilly would not be piddling with a few people here an there. They are huge and that’s how they roll...Huge!!
icon url

Major Profits

12/22/17 12:33 AM

#104726 RE: EOT #104714

Did you read the agreement? Oh, yeah, guess you did (or at least PART of it) as you quoted, what I consider, to be the most important part:

“VSRI will provide Eli Lilly with an assessment of Cardio Vascular Disease (CVD) among newly diagnosed diabetes patients at increased risk of CVD in China.”


So tell me, how does the "Supplier" (VSRI) make a ton of money off of Eli Lilly for providing an "assessment" (which, to me, seems to be simply INFORMATION) and for what I believe to be a ONE-TIME PAYMENT from Eli Lilly?

Here:

Section 13 Payment

13.1 Payment Terms. Payment will be dues sixty (60) days following the receipt by by Lilly's Accounts Payable Department of an involice that complies with the requirements of ths Agreement.


Now, I could be wrong, but do tell me, how do you come up with this (imo!!) PREPOSTEROUS mathematical equation based on the above?

so let’s say 10mil people @$10 per patient= $100million. Do you understand now? We won’t know the figures until the financials come out, but it’s pretty huge. Could be less or more, but that’s the way this contract works.


Again, so how do you come up with those numbers having anything whatsoever to do with the purchasing of an "assessment" from the "Supplier" (VSRI) for a one-time fee by Eli Lilly? Seriously!

Heck, didn't we already know that VSRI has worked with Lilly in the past? But that was before JT stuck his (untrustworthy, imo!!) nose into things and now we are to think that we're gonna get rich based on the purchase of an "Assessment" from VSRI by Eli Lilly? Please tell me how. lol....

Incredible.

JMOs

P.S. Indeed, I see nothing in that agreement but more of JTs "Carrot Dangling". Prove me wrong. ;-)