Sure, the phrase "significant" can be subjective. But not entirely, when it comes to using geochemical results to promote a mining project. I doubt JB would stand up in front of a group of his peers, and tout REE and cobalt in an Arizona porphyry copper project, even if the geochem numbers were double or triple background levels. At 10X background, maybe the interest level rises from an academic perspective......but even then, it is a long, long ways from those metals being a recoverable and economically viable commodity, even as a byproduct.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
