Replies to post #74371 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[janice shell]

You're wrong, Matt.

Now, thanks to you, there's no alternative (or, as the mods would say, "negative") point of view being expressed on the SLJB board.

Did you notice that last night, when some were "voting" to ban Jim and me, quite a few longs said we shouldn't be banned? Oh, perhaps you missed that.

so what, most of those folks just don't know how to respond to you.

In what sense is that my fault? They need to learn how to respond, and how to make an intelligent argument. I have little respect for moderators who ask me to stop posting because I "upset" people with my "negativity".

I've done very little off-topic posting on the SLJB board. When I have, it's usually been in response to a legitimate question from another poster. Face it: most penny stock stories have relevance to other penny stock stories.

You've set a bad example. They're gloating.

[USA*2014]

That board is out of control. Any opposing view point is responded with a barrage of insults. Like many penny stocks people are thinking one of two ways, I will be so rich my life will be great, or oh my what if I lose all my money. What a hornets nest.

That stock will be interesting to watch for many reasons. I enjoy reading both sides of the coin and now it looks as if its a pump only board. To bad new investors should be able to read negatives every bit as much as positives. As long as posts are done properly and in accordance to IHUB regs they should never be removed.

[Jim Bishop]

Okay, it worked. Sometimes when messages are flying into my inbox multiple times a minute I often don't check to see what board I'm replying on.

I'll try to be more careful.

[accountabilityDR]

When will you cease with this "cult board" semantics copout? At best, some of these mods are ragingbulldinkys clueless to any DD and/or having even read YOUR tou-rules. And at worst, some of these mods are actual INSIDERS given complete control of the ihub-delete function!

Until you and 5%grub begin holding these out-of-control-deletion-mods to an even HIGHER standard of ACCOUNTABILITY than regular posters, the strong-personal-attack posts will continue frenzying into death-threat posts. Reminds me of the old tvcp-zwebner boards at rb?

THIS IS NOT MY OPINION, IT IS FACT! The dysfunctional mods at CSHD and 5%grub have yet to delete 4 death-threat posts still remaining posted up at CSHD.

See bones1420 post #82032 (and click-back) at the jailhouse!

[greenspirit]

Matt: I have given you all day to respond to my pm's and do the right thing. And it appears avoidance has been your answer. Therefore, I resign as the moderator of SLJB effective immediately. Not having the support of IHUB management and allowing a couple of cult followers of this site to be given special treatment and moderate from the sidelines, is not something I want to be involved with.

As my final request, please reinstate the following banned members. Their one week time is up today, and I gave my word I would request their reinstatement on the 7th day.

tombrady12nh
Rawnoc
syracuseo
BRIG_88
jimmym4
SPIN

Perhaps Janice Shell will take over as moderator. She's told me how proud she is of her bookmarks, and I'm sure she sees the board as some kind of fertile ground.

[bobrainey300]

I know it's a cult and the board is insane. Work with me here.

in regards to the SLJB board.....

You have done a good job of creating an environment in which seasoned sharks manipulate the asylum for monetary gain. I realize you manage your ban list to reduce complaints, but somewhere the actual rules that govern the BBS should come into play.

If stock manipulators who predict the exact timing of 10 SLJB PRs in a row can spew nonsense unabated, I don't see why my opinion given in context should be squashed.

[Id_Jit]

Matt: Do you have any idea how much longer we have to put up with the clogging of this board with SLJB stuff?

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13707688

”I know it's a cult and the board is insane. Work with me here.”
That was: Dated: "10/2/2006 1:26:38 AM"
Seems not much has changed since then…
AND No… I don’t read the board Nor am I invested.

I have better things to waste my time on than the discussion of SLJB on this board.
Perhaps others do too.

Id