hayward, possibly expect the week of December 11th to be reasonable.
They probably had some delays with all the ASM fuss. And a Q/CC must be prepared and in this case has an important section of events of things that happened between the close of the Quarter and the Q/CC.
Also not sure if and how they would renew analyst coverage. Will CEO King still be CEO King at that time and if NOT then will there be a new CEO and who will take the lead of the Q/CC on such short notice.
Also, given the very good and unexpected sales of HALO we'dd be curious to hear the very last news of that provided it would already have translated in communications to Avid in relation to re-activating the back-orders that were temporarily put on hold.
Finally there will be lots of questions (or should be and should be allowed) on whether PPHM is in talks with parties in relation to R&D and PS-targeting.
PPHM can not have ANY legal problems with confirming that, it can only bring even more candidates to the table and that should be something they WANT, if they don't name names.
So AGAIN I plead for PPHM to make generic communications on the topic that can not have been forbidden if more then one candidate is in talks, such as they have a long-list, strive to a short-list on ABC, and would like to have a deal at the latest on XYZ.
On a SIDE LINE: NOTICE how the contract between RONIN and PPHM emphasises the closing of LEAKS (called information). The fact that RONIN took the deal and that such strong anti-leak language is used points to the presence of negotiations that, would the leak, could have a market impact.
AIMO.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
