"In other words, Bravtek's debt will seem paltry compared to its actual value."
If there was a basis to actually demonstrate that, then perhaps. Otherwise it strikes a wishful thinking. Why?
1) What actual value has Tom been able to demonstrate? Financial performance? NO. Real contracts for real revenue that is defined in magnitude and time? NO. Agreements with real, mature and performing companies? NO. The only financial performance demonstrated in any significant way is the sale of convertible debt notes and conversion of those notes into stock. Pretty much the ENTIRE current OS of 7.5 BILLION shares is from note conversions.
2) If there was actually ANYTHING of value that the potential "equity investors" see leading to the "improving offers" you suggest then why has Tom not been able to attract ANY traditional debt financing?? He has only been able to attract toxic penny financing...as recently as October 12? Surely some "equity investor" willing to pay out a note holder 300-400% on their investment (as you speculate) would mean that there is AT LEAST enough "value" that can be demonstrated in the business to AT LEAST get some normal non-toxic financing??? But he hasn't.
And lastly...the market seems overall unimpressed by his efforts to date. And frankly...if he had an REAL "irons" that had ANY REAL meaning to BVTK he would not be keeping it a secret. Given some of the nonsense "agreements" he has 8K'd (look at where IDDR is..back to low trips)...it is highly likely that is the best he has got...despite the "big news" he has been referring to for quite some time...yet has not delivered. So it is probably reasonable to ask if it really exists?...or was it always just meant to be what he has already disclosed...but he won't admit it?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
