> I certainly cannot say that for evolution which goes against
> all logic as I said, I rejected evolution as totally
> illogical and unsupported by real evidence
you can reject science all you want. but that is what you're doing. you're not choosing one "theory" over another. if you walked into a med school and started rewriting science this way, it would be like me walking in on the investigation of the recent shuttle explosion and telling them how it was caused by peculiar properties of phlogiston that they neglected to take into account in designing their engines.
> Evolution is
> just as much a religion (a secular, humanistic religion) as
> any other.
this is an argument made by those with a religious agenda; specifically on the teaching of the bible in high school science classes. show me a church of secular humanism, and i'll retract.
> Its intent is to enable folks to plausibly deny God.
blah. most of the christians of the world (outside the u.s.) would seriously dispute this statement.
now i'm going to have to find those stats ...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
