DrRocker, well that answer is in TWO parts.
Do I believe these people are CAUSE of what happens to companies to which BoD's they are delegated because those companies received funding and need to be watched? NO. That is part of that kind of penny stock and small cap financing. It is HIGH RISK. They step into 10 and if one is successful they are profitable. Roswell is not the only company in that business. And DP and CJ have been such delegates in such BoD's they are not the CAUSE of the products not working just as the people listed on RONIN's candidates list are mainly not the cause for the success of the company while they were there. Hence RONIN's smart formulation IMO : "while they where present".
BUT if RONIN would have shown a causal effect, discovered some fraud or disclosed any other illegal thing by one of the 3 that would have been different.
But in my book these 3 people ES, DJ and CJ have been accused in an hostile way by a letter to PPHM shareholders and they should has set the record right. At this point, while I am quite convinced RONIN's presentation of the facts is a well constructed one that leave US to fill in the part RONIN doesn't say but steers to. That can ONLY be UNDONE by DP, ES and CJ defending themselves against these accusations and by lack thereof even I will start to believe that RONIN might have hit a nail.
So now these 3 must sit at the negotiation table with potential partners, acquirers, collaborators, other BOD members, etc. What impression do they leave? Well, IMO, at the first mistake that could be construed for something else then a mistake this UNCLEAR REPUTATION will work against PPHM and hence against our INVESTMENT. Because don't think for a moment that whatever party that comes to the table for some MEANINGFUL business will not fail to do D&D first, and RONIN's Letters being SEC listed cannot be missed.
So, sorry if what RONIN says about ES, CJ and DP is false, but by lack of defence they must go as they have the appearances against them.
AIMO
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
