Yep, I think I understand just were you stand. Obviously the porpoises here have made $$$ from the stock, while others have
believed everything whatever the two head honchos have said would come true, would come true in a shorter term that what was anticipated, If either of JF or Cg put definite time frames on the things that they said would happen and didn't achieve those goals then some would, though probably having too much trust, in any case, they would still have some grounds for feeling they had been done over. Don't know the score there.
Seems reasonable for you to try to estimate how many subs they would need to be a survivor as they, surely, must have done it themselves. The point made about other revenue streams upsetting your figures, I'd, suppose you'd agree with as it seems the answer is obvious.
You concede, "But maybe they've got that all figured out.", exactly spot on; what else can we say at this point. I'm just hoping that they , at least, honestly think they have it figured out.. Repeated failure of new airlines in Australia are evidence of just how hard it is for a startup to succeed against entrenched interests. Everything is against success. It's always been a gamble,
It's also increasingly obvious that the company had better take, more seriously, the matter of public relations and shareholder state of mind, so pps, as we come nearer to the point where make or break is more evident. cheers
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
