It just adds to the overall crap posted that turns people off. The negative hit pieces in 2015 did major and lasting damage in turning the company name into mud. The other crap just reinforces that negative impression. It's easier to simply move on since most don't have the time it takes to do the research to determine reality.
Those hit pieces even hurt clinical trial recruitment. I recently saw a discussion on a patient support site discussing the first Mako piece. I came across it while searching for validation of a recent post by nerby. Some of the patients decided they'd never enter a trial sponsored by this company due to that article. And, I wouldn't expect them to even consider researching whether or not the hit piece was correct. Those patients have other things to worry about.
Btw, look at that chart hound posted showing the day those numbers were first posted.
In Reply to 'Blues44' Do you really believe that AlanC's daily naked short postings is creating enough doubt in a potential investors mind that it's scaring them away from investing in IPIX? What type of investor would that be? smh
Doubt it and the posters creating fud don't make a difference either. It's just noise pushing the factual posts to the bottom.
When the Big money decides IPIX is worth investing in, then the stock will soar. If they never do, then it won't. Daily penny flippers certainly aren't going to make move it higher.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
