News Focus
News Focus
icon url

williamssc

10/12/17 7:16 PM

#199919 RE: scottsmith #199917

Back then they had the wind in their sails to fund ABSSSI but that ship has sailed. B likely to save the day in the other indications allowing Leo to readdress ABSSSI. OM and UP plays right in B's anti-inflammatory wheel house:)
icon url

Bruinfan4ever

10/12/17 7:18 PM

#199921 RE: scottsmith #199917

Whether it's partly true or all true, it's not wrong. We know the first announcement was Oct 23, and then a follow up Dec 8th. You can't prove that isn't the case.

I could careless what your subscribers say. It's not a matter of opinion. It's fact.
icon url

BonelessCat

10/12/17 10:04 PM

#199937 RE: scottsmith #199917

What nonsense. I’ve been here since before Leo took over. The price started its series of parabolic steps with a move up in July 2012 when it peaked at 1.90 range from a .60 start. It then entered a volatile but range bound trading pattern for the next 18 months. It then entered another parabolic stair-step beginning July-August 2014. Through all of that a pump group claiming to be looking for over $50 before selling kept adding participants. The group began liquidating CTIX at $4 and moving that money into CLSN which was supposed to be a lock on a FDA drug approval. Nearly the entire group took the money from their CTIX success put it into CLSN only to lose ninety cents on the dollar when CLSN failed its FDA approval. Yes, positive PRs of progression (announcing the Aspire deal started the run in 2012) were catalysts, but the pumping came from the $50 group. A rabbit participated only to lose huge. All those shareholders had planned to take their CLSN sure thing profits and reenter CTIX above $2, which of course never happened.

The main reason for the spike was that pump team. If one wasn’t here, one wouldn’t know that.