News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stevo51

09/23/06 5:15 PM

#21765 RE: dmondial #21764

V said that those numbers only were for kiddie products they did not include any numbers for the security end of the business.is that correct?..
icon url

metropick

09/23/06 5:35 PM

#21766 RE: dmondial #21764

dmondial - thanks for the analysis! can't wait for monday!!!
icon url

nathanial

09/23/06 5:59 PM

#21769 RE: dmondial #21764

dmondial....where can I get/buy one of those calculators that you use? THANKS.
icon url

bylosellhier

09/24/06 9:25 PM

#22037 RE: dmondial #21764

A question, dmondial:

Your numbers certainly look a lot more realistic. You applied each Q's increase to the $156K base. However, the post I referred to applied each % increase to the preceding Q, not to the base.

$2.8M is a lot more believable but I would like to be sure which calculation method was intended. Big difference between being "a little wealthier" and "stinkin' rich."

Thanks and best of luck to us both.