RD; Any reason to why you believe it's the loan1&2-lender who's selling the shares? And that it's a US-based lender? (I know it has been discussed somewhat here earlier). That would be "good" news, since that's the smaller of the loans. However, it is also the one with the best interest rate.
Do we know anything about this lender? If it is indeed a US-lender then SIAF should be in a better position to sue (if the loan-contract isn't rotten and SIAF has held it's part) if the shares are sold and isn't bought back.
Of course; even if collateral shares are sold, then it still is possible that the lender will buy them back - however, as long as we don't know who this lender is it's difficult to know. The lender might have chosen to gamble and sell of the shares and buy them back later. The lender might not have had this intention intially, but maybe decided to do that with the dual-listing and crybaby Hansson selling out and panick followed. Purely speculations though, but so is the option that SIAF chose a rotten lender (might still be right of course).
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
