News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Dmmr

09/01/17 8:54 PM

#27372 RE: Dmmr #27370

However show me a flying robotic drone, it lands it self to charge back up, then that would be a game changer.



icon url

BurningMan

09/01/17 9:00 PM

#27374 RE: Dmmr #27370

What ?! They are way cheaper than hiring a person. You use them like a lease. Example: Knitescope leases them for $6.25 and hour which is cheaper than paying someone , right ? This company should follow that model soon enough !!!
icon url

Computerbux

09/01/17 9:08 PM

#27375 RE: Dmmr #27370

The cost of the robot is less expensive. Robots don't take breaks. They work in 12 hour shifts. They don't need uniforms. They don't sleep or get tired. They don't take sick, vacation, or personal leave. They don't need health, dental, vision, disability, or life insurance. You don't pay employer taxes or FICA on bots. They don't need workers comp insurance. They don't need training.

Etc etc etc
icon url

Havoc23

09/01/17 9:19 PM

#27380 RE: Dmmr #27370

I know for a fact that a security guard working at a critical infrastructure site can easily make over $100,000 in a year. Not including benefits. Using robots is not only cheaper, but more efficient. Robots don't sleep or get bored/complacent.

Radbots aren't taking over for the typical mall cop. They're designed to guard power plants, critical waste sites, government facilities. The bots could save these organizations millions, easily.