The fact they treated the fever in ph2 is not relevant. Also the fact they mixed immunotherapy drug with chemotherapy is not relevant. These 2 are both mistakes. Pls read the article I published few days ago and see how foolish u have to be to treat the fever. What chemotherapy mean ? What treating fever mean ? It means u disturb the immune system from working . And what is fighting the cancer in vb111 ? The immune system. Isn't it foolish ? There are no swings . I m trying to be objective . Most people feel easier of having one side they support I try to avoid that.
I m not spamming anybody with my emails. I had a discussion with them in the past and any comment that can help is most welcome by anybody including the company. There is basic common sense . If u know patients with 37 c lives 6 months and people with 37.5 lives 6 months and people with 38 lives 9 months and people with 40 c lives 24 months on average. Does it make sense to reduce their fever by other drugs ? Maybe it makes more sense to avoid treating unless it cause severe risk and even then to treat mildly and not just until the patient feels no fever ? Don't u see that treating the fever may kill them earlier?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
