Well, I can present this as evidence to back up my 'bashing' from earlier. I can see why, with evidence like this, the messenger would be attacked rather than the message. It's hard to rewrite history, unless you are a politician.
date open high low close volume adj close
28-Feb-06 0.81 0.87 0.77 0.78 3,438,300 0.78
27-Feb-06 0.66 0.80 0.63 0.79 10,200,100 0.79
24-Feb-06 0.79 0.85 0.74 0.75 6,228,100 0.75
I didn't create the news story on Feb 24 or the one on the 27th. But there are some here that call it bashing to point out what HISTORY shows us. And yes, there are more events just like it, but I don't believe showing them would be worth my time. Gee - I hope I don't have to inform the uninformed about what events took place in that timeframe.
With all the trouble people go through in creating/using/switching between aliases around here, I would need to respond to multiple people multiple times!
It's amazing how poorly a tongue-in-cheek comment can be taken around here.
Market Data 
Markets 
