Nothing about SUNRISE was filed to the FDA. There are 2 trials ruining. And pre-clinical as a basis doesn't NEED to be approved upfront.
A filing can ALSO be made based on ASCO results in CAR-T+Bavi. No need it is ALREADY filed.
The point that was made it that the 3-12 years is just a scenario and that the 3-12 weeks would be an equally valid scenario. The post said clearly that BOTH have no real basis.
But strangely PPHM IR people statements by mail to private posters are apparently of value compared to statements of other PPHM related people (such as those present on the PPHM Annual Meeting) that are said to be mostly anecdotal. The TWO standards don't work well when mixed IMO.