News Focus
News Focus
icon url

sox040713

07/25/17 8:28 PM

#191619 RE: TheHound #191618

Hound, only the bogeyman knows the answer.

i see finra being referenced as a source but there's never a link provided. any thoughts as to why that is?

icon url

BooDog

07/25/17 8:30 PM

#191620 RE: TheHound #191618

Have to say, I'm very comfortable with my position. We'll see where we are 6 months from now. But I'm thinking I'll easily be remodeling my house.

Cut out the short posts. It's all bs.

They fry. They just don't know it yet.
icon url

loanranger

07/26/17 4:18 AM

#191636 RE: TheHound #191618

"we're being told x% of today's sales were short sales. is that statement being made by finra.....?"

Of course it is. The data is published in a column headed "Short Volume" as part of something called the Daily Short Sale Volume File and anyone can find it at...
http://regsho.finra.org/regsho-Index.html

You're blaming the messenger, albeit a persistent one (who only adds a simple percentage calculation), when the problem is with FINRA's use of the term "short", a term that has a broadly accepted definition in the vernacular, to mean something else that has to do with its technical application in the industry.

The only way to defuse the daily false impression it leaves is to provide FINRA's definition as used in the file daily as well.

IPIX's current share price does not currently reflect any significant short selling pressure. I think that the problem, if one believes that there is one, may be a lack of buying pressure.