News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jyyoo

07/25/17 11:47 AM

#115800 RE: challe08 #115798

I remember and agree challe08; If we were listed elsewhere we would be given a normal valuation at 10x+ the price we are at. The poster you just responded to shows exactly what is wrong..still questioning the company even with audited financials and bank loans from unbelievably credible institutions. That is why I support the COSO strategy. Eventually the shares will turn over to stronger smarter institutional hands. Keep in mind, there are many institutions in the U.S. who are simply waiting for milestones to be hit before buying. I don't think it is a coincidence we just saw a large spike in the price on larger volume than we've ever seen before after what some may call a few "milestones". Imagine what will happen once these institutions start buying more after a milestone like the Triway Dividend, more loans, pre-IPO financing etc.
icon url

ks1977

07/25/17 12:01 PM

#115803 RE: challe08 #115798

Well, I said Oslo and not US, but why shouldn't SIAF get a somewhat decent PPS after a proven (and decent) dividend history if they list on a respected and transparent market with strict rules? There is likely to be a "china-discount", but a P/E of 0,5? Yes, if SIAF continues to treat it's shareholders like it has in the past (especially prior to 2014), but with the carve-out-prosesses - AFTER a successful/proven carve-out of Tri-Way?

Left the scam-discussion years ago? Well, many potential investors stay away because it's too good to be true. What other explanation do you have to a PPS that is lower than the estimated valuation of the dividend shares of Tri-Way? Distrust is the only answer
icon url

starfire394

07/25/17 2:13 PM

#115837 RE: challe08 #115798

Proven? What have You proven? Can I take Your proofs to the bank?