You are right about one thing, it wasn't a delay tactic. IMHO, it may have been a shake the tree tactic or a hasty decision by the company to keep the stop sign from happening. Before you rebut this, I would like to ask your why there were 5 perfectly filed financial reports, when RO was involved. The Annual 2015, Q1 2016, Q2 2016, Q3 2016 and the Annual 2016, were all filed under his watch and Attorney letters certifying current information were also filed, bring the company current the first time. Go back and look at those financials and you will see that they have a different format and different fonts for those financials.
IMHO, the original Q1 2017, the first amended Q1 2017, the second amended Q1 2017, the third amended Q1 2017, were all filed while RO was on vacation. If you look at the formats and fonts of those financial reports, they are totally different from those filed under his watch, which removed the first stop sign. The fourth amended Q1 2017, was filed, under his watch also when he returned from his vacation and the stop sign was removed. Who filed the first four Q1 2017 reports? IMHO, I believe that the company wanted them filed to avoid the stop sign and someone obeyed the company's request without checking the reports or checking with RO first. No one on this board knows why it happened, so cut RO some slack because, he was the one who followed through and had the stop sign removed this time, also.
The alternative is that the company directed him to file those reports knowing that they were incorrect to shake some shares loose and none here wants to hear my laundry list of things that I believe may substantiate this assertion.
DOLV/JBMY, patient, long and strong.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
