Replies to post #72076 on Conversion Solutions Holdings (fka CSHD)

[bleah]

for it to be a 50-100 bagger, 5 to 10 billion dollars of new money is going to have to come into this stock (assuming everybody sells of course). But even if everyone doesn't sell at once, we're still talking about billions of dollars having to come in.
I don't see a 50-100 bagger. Maybe a 2-5 bagger (and I do mean maybe)... looking at a few hundred million dollars coming is, is a bit more reasonable (assuming the 10k is okay)..
Otherwise hedge funds would go bankrupt if this were the case.

[brandon05]

Man, that would be sweet as hell. I still think that CSHD will go down in history like SPEA did.

GLTA!

[cindyyoohoo]

Aloha BigBlue - nice list of reposts that include a whole lot of misleading info and predictions. Even your intro makes a statement by you - CSHD: 50-100 bagger is NOT out of the question...
10K GAME, SET, MATCH!!! CHECKMATE!!!
Maybe you should alert these "people" of the following SEC action - sounds a tad familiar to me.
Had already reminded Frenchy a few days ago.

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2000-124.txt
http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/internetenforce/sweeparchive.htm
6. SEC v. Gursel Mandaci
(U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York)
(SEC Contact: Robert Blackburn, 212-748-8185)
The SEC alleges that from February to April 2000, Gursel
Mandaci, a college student and driver for a car service, used the
Internet to inflate the price of securities that he had purchased
in order to create short-term trading profits. Mandaci's
strategy was to purchase penny stocks using a margin account he
holds at an online broker, and then make large numbers of
Internet postings that touted the issuers. These postings
included false information about the issuers and baseless price
predictions. Mandaci made more than $23,000 in six stocks he
manipulated, including one stock that increased in price from
$0.01 to $0.38. The SEC has filed a civil injunctive action
against Mandaci alleging violations of Section 17(a) of the
Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act. The SEC seeks
an order requiring Mandaci to pay disgorgement of $23,073 plus
prejudgment interest, and pay a civil monetary penalty.




;)