So, other than rank speculation, do YOU have any proof that:
1) Any of the recent inoh stock "dumping" did NOT wind up in Goldberg's crooked hands? any? Any justifiable reason to think it didnt?
2) Any of the recent inoh stock "dumping" did NOT find its way to Rosendo Alvarez's hands? Is there any reasonable reason to think it didnt?
While you are at it ... do you have any real proof (not rank speculation and telling me to look at the history) that Rosendo Alvarez simply handed over $421K in convertible notes to the company? roflmao cmon man.
By the way, I never stated: "Obviously if the shares were returned, they were not converted and "dumped" by him.
Again, I never stated it.
Anyone can speculate and claim the company is doing this and or doing that. Providing proof is quite different.
Any proof to back up YOUR claims?
Not ... look at this indication or look at that indication, but real actual hard proof??
SUCH AS:
1.PROVIDE PROOF of the more likely scenario being that the recent increase in A/S was to provide some shares to him. Those share would be restricted.
No proof ? then its just rank speculation.
2.Provide proof of your claims that INOH is changing direction, bringing in new blood/leadership and starting a new business venture.
Just because they say it in a Pr means exactly NOTHING. We have literally years of press releases with claims that have been out and out lies.
IT IS STATED :"Let's give them a chance. Good opportunity to buy low and sell high. Isn't that what the stock market is all about or did I miss something?"
YES, MISSED A VERY VITAL POINT - every single claim this company has made since its inception has been a lie. THAT IS QUITE SIGNIFICANT.
NEXT: INOH is entering into a field that, some people may not like or think it is controlled by "druggies", but is very lucrative. There are many companies in the MJ field that want to merge into or become associated with a publicly traded company. What better way to do it then to associate with a company in which you can become the main part of the business.
Wrong again. the fact is the company is only making claims. AGAIN, we have the overwhelming facts to show this company says one thing and completes little if anything.
I ALONG WITH SEVERAL OTHERS HAVE WITNESSED LITERALLY YEARS OF OUT AND OUT FRAUD FROM THIS COMPANY. IT IS ALL OUTLINED IN THE INOH "NOPE" LIST AND CAN BE CONFIRMED BY THE DAILY ENTRIES MADE IN THE INOH THREAD.
ITS ALL HERE, PHONY COMPANY PRESS RELEASES, OFFICER/DIRECTORS WORDS IN INTERVIEWS, DAILY BLOG ENTRIES ETC ETC.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
