News Focus
News Focus
icon url

boogaloo

09/07/06 12:13 PM

#65994 RE: rmt28265 #65991

Of course, it's obvious that calls can annoy and jeopardize relationships... but as far as calls voiding a signed CONTRACT, I don't buy that for a second. If that's the case, then it was a handshake and not a real contract in the first place.
icon url

moxyone

09/07/06 12:15 PM

#65999 RE: rmt28265 #65991

Josh

It appears that Dwight is
attempting to lay the groundwork for "shareholder blame" when deals fall through, which they already have according to your earlier post.

An Investor Relations firm is in business to relate to Investors.

thats it. period.

the end game is indeed here.

icon url

MarketReader

09/07/06 12:15 PM

#66000 RE: rmt28265 #65991

he also may have said that (if he really did) to send a message of how important it is to stop calling
jmho
icon url

JIMWJ

09/07/06 12:20 PM

#66007 RE: rmt28265 #65991

Josh If you called my business with your stupid, redundant questions, you would get hung up on.
JWj
icon url

Stock H.O.G.

09/07/06 12:27 PM

#66021 RE: rmt28265 #65991

The deal was signed and sealed, soon to be delivered (the goods that is). I seriosly doubt there was a claus in the contract saying that they can cancel it if a bunch of idiots call to ask questions about the quality of the concrete. Come on now, let's get real.