Replies to post #65893 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[boogaloo]

I'm not sure I believe that. I've heard a pinksheet use that "calls ruined our closed contract" excuse before. A contractor who has a competitive advantage via a new contract ($$$) will not cancel it due to phone calls from moron investors. They will simply refuse the calls, right?

If what you say IS true, then DAMN.

[bobrainey300]

The problem for Sulja is that few investors really believe this story. It does sound too good to be true.

If the company wants shareholders to quit bombarding their partners with phone calls, then they need to instill the proper confidence that can only come from the release of the financials, and the comencement of the share buy by Wessal.

Until that happens, they will have to put up with the near universal doubt surrounding their past PRs.

[BerryBuck]

Finalized contract and investors calling supposedly ruined a $300 + MILLION contract. thats a joke. completely silly imo.
kind of hard to pull out of a FINALIZED contract. for either party.

[Stock4life]

I know you are joking but what about that poor who just sold his 5 shares.........you should be kind.

From PR.........The cement contract has been finalized, and the contract is officially closed.

[Sverte]

Josh, IMO, the company has created the problem with the information they have put out and the way they have handled the PR's. Below is a repost of #65679 earlier.


REPOST: With respect to the recent cabal over the new CEO and other recent PR's, there is a very simple solution, which would dispel confusion, and felt need to scurry around for information and confirmation to support what is released. An intelligent, cogently written, and thorough PR statement would do the trick. After all, the purpose of a PR is to promote the company. A successful PR causes investors to place their money in your company's stock, increasing demand and share price which increases your market cap, etc.

Poorly worded, cryptic, confusing, contradicting, and incomplete PR's promote confusion, apprehension, and ultimately may cause existing investors to question the soundness of their investment decision (inducing some of them to sell for fear of investment loss) or cause other potential investors to stay away from your stock.

The company is the only one who is in charge of the direction of their stock (with regards to PR's and its affect). Good PR's, chronicling real growth, solid business developments, sales, contracts, etc., written intelligently, with externally verifiable information will instill confidence and promote a growth in stock price and contribute to the success of the company. Since the stated purpose of SLJB is to reach the NASDAQ, I would expect this caliber of PR's as well as building associations with individuals and professional companies to get you to that goal. The development of Marquee AM as the IR, IMO, failed to project that kind of professionalism and expectation.

BTW, I simply do not buy the idea that a PR should be cryptic and confusing so that "weak hands" will sell and be replaced by "strong hands". IMO, this is contrary to the purpose of a PR and defies logic.

I have been called a "basher" by asking questions, seeking clarification, and trying to understand some of this company's confusing and questionable PR's. Yet, I have been a long since October 2005 and bought some really cheap in the .008's. I verified the credibility of LFWK's properties and development. I have done similarly with SLJB. But the rise of a company with 25 million in profits to over 650 million without quality, intelligent, and professional PR's have caused the reactions we have seen in recent weeks.

People like myself hang on here because of the potential risk/reward factor. However, a company that wants to march into the NASDAQ must stop operating like a pinkie if they expect to make the transition successfully. JMO.

No, I won’t sell and move on just to make a few people who think they are superior to others happy. I will do what I believe is in my best interest regardless of what you call me. This board is here for the free exchange of ideas and opinions. This is mine. Sorry for the long post; just had to get this off my chest! :-)>

GLTA

BTW, a good example of a CEO change came in this morning. Check out
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13154990

[gwikley]

Josh, man.....please,give it a rest./eom

[Confuzzled1]

You didn't say it? Whats this then?

"Man, I agree 1000000%. I didn't believe what Petar told me until I spoke with Dwight at Marquee. I was told by Petar that they are working diligently to resolve that issue and he thinks that they will be able to do that, but at 2030 yesterday evening, it was dead. He also said that we should see a PR today explaining it in great detail and that no investor reading the wires would be confused what it was about. I am awaiting that PR. Needless to say,"