News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BAMF31

05/03/17 11:35 AM

#89311 RE: happpytrader #89302

Agreed. I was disputing the statement that Medmar would have to pay OWC or that maybe they don't have the $300,000 as posted by $UPERMAN (see below). I see that others have destroyed this falsity as well.



$UPERMAN Member Level Wednesday, 05/03/17 11:15:38 AM
Re: DigitalTradz post# 89288
Post #
89292
of 89304 Go
I said, likely due to Non Performance.

Watch, I would bet Medmar doesn't have the money to repay.

Now we learn they also didn't get legal permits in two states.

Could end up getting real ugly fast.

Thanks for sharing.



$UPERMAN Member Level Wednesday, 05/03/17 11:10:56 AM
Re: ChillinCharlie post# 89285
Post #
89290
of 89308 Go
Awesome call, Charlie. This release is their public notice.

Maybe it was a surprise to them too?

Maybe they Do intend on disputing this with OWCP?

Maybe Medmar doesn't have the $300,000 to pay back?

It will be good to hear what Medmar says later today.

Thanks