Nothing will happen in the short term as the company has no vested interest in changing the status quo. If they go to court and ask for a permanent injunction to negate the ability of TJ Management to ever sell these shares, they then would seek to permanently remove these shares from the float/OS by means of a judgement, which per se, would then necessitate the ruling court, under good faith doctrines, to award the now defunct TJ Management principles the financial consideration plus interest of the monies they funded the company with as adequate renumeration to satisfy their interests. That versus the more appropriate do nothing doctrine, whereupon BLDV keeps the money used to fund them, without benefit of having to sacrifice the shares pledged for such monies.
THANK YOU.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
