News Focus
News Focus
icon url

locustsuc

09/02/06 12:05 AM

#62166 RE: fringe_remnant #62162

It doesn't bother me one bit that you post here except for the fact that you are not a man of your word. You said 2 hours ago that you were done posting. "I won't post again until that happens, leave the board alone. I wish you the best of luck here." So please stand by your word so we can get the discussion back onto the stock rather than you.

Posted by: fringe_remnant
In reply to: The_Free_Nebula who wrote msg# 62097
Date:9/1/2006 10:05:06 PM
Post #of 62165

TFN

I do not have any problem with your the basis of your retort. It places the emphasis on getting well received fundamental events between the 14th and 19th. For me, I don't take those risks on penny stocks. I watch the money on the chart. And the formation for recognizable pattern.

I don't see how that tries to force a point. I'm just looking.

penny_ta says that we shouldn't be watching OBV, ChiOsc, Accumualtion Lines or the Money Flow. Says it doesn't work in the pennies. And MACD isn't really much of a problem.

At this point I stop arguing.

From here on in guys it's a wait and see. I'm out, you are in.

There is still time for either to make a decision. I'll make mine when I know what she is going to do.

I won't post again until that happens, leave the board alone. I wish you the best of luck here.

"The rising wedge is a bearish pattern that begins wide at the bottom and contracts as prices move higher and the trading range narrows. In contrast to symmetrical triangles, which have no definitive slope and no bullish or bearish bias, rising wedges definitely slope up and have a bearish bias."

http://stockcharts.com/education/ChartAnalysis/risingWedge.html

fringe
icon url

rrufff

09/02/06 12:09 AM

#62167 RE: fringe_remnant #62162

I found the post moronic. I said it before and really don't want to say it again. But as you insist.

I was NOT calling you or your post moronic. The post was about MM manipulation and a theory that I find totally moronic given the fact pattern here.

That you wish to continue bringing this type of thing here, combined with your endless posting back and forth about nuances, and then whining about the moderators, made me believe that you are here to disrupt the board.

OK?

Am I clear?

That's my opinion.

It doesn't have to be that way. You and I can get along. We have in the past. I'm not opposed to negative posts. But when it gets repetitive, and it's generic, it becomes what I call MGB = Moronic Generic Bash.

And as I said, we both know that you moderated with a heavy hand on EKWK and we know what happened there.

So, let's stick to substance and NEW discussion.
icon url

4Justice

09/02/06 12:50 AM

#62199 RE: fringe_remnant #62162

If you two would not mind, could you please limit your diagreements to PM please. These discussions really don't benefit the board or its purpose.

No disrespect meant. Just tired of reading this ongoing war.