thanks smart - I'm not opposed to negatives. But the intent of a few have been to be disruptive with repetitive analyses that is opinion.
Putting a chart into a post does NOT CREATE A FACT. THis is particularly true in a very speculative stock that can be manipulated by MM's.
I just read a series of posts where a TA guy is analyzing his chart and then comparing them to the fluffiness of PR's. Seriously, give me a break!!!!!
Look at the math, the statistical background for any theory of TA, and you will understand why many feel it's foolish to use this type of analysis in speculative and easily manipulated penny stocks.
Again, I'm not opposed to the discussion but repetitive and disruptive posts have been removed.