Doug...sorry but I don't agree. There are no Trojan horses & provided ONCE abides by the site's TOU, he should be allowed to stay. If someone doesn't like what ONCE says, put him on FILTER or MENTAL IGNORE. I have no one on FILTER...what for? I have found that naysayers on stock boards cause people to think about one's investment decisions. Looking at a stock with rose colored glasses or falling in love with a stock is the surest way to lose your money.
iHub has gone thru this before; at least on the EDIG board. The purposes of the stock boards is civil debate. Language that was used on the IDCC board is totally inappropriate. Let's put it this way...what would your reaction be to Joe Kernen saying that "the screams of the IDCC shareholders at the recent plunge can be likened to someone chopping off my penis". Methinks you wouldn't hear comments such as those on CNBC nor should a reader of stock boards be subjected to that either. There are places on iHub to goof off & use "colorful" language; stock boards are not one of them.
You forget that we all post at the pleasure of Matt & Bob. It is their sandbox...their rules. All TEECEE has to do is agree to abide by the site's TOU & he will be free to continue posting. What's so difficult about that?
Matt has declared his position in this instance & I for one would be disappointed if he caved to the blackmail of the IDCC cult.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
