News Focus
News Focus
icon url

F6

04/13/17 7:51 PM

#268111 RE: Garden Rose #268105

Garden Rose -- false -- there are many very good/highly competent scientists (and engineers) involved in analyses by our intelligence and military -- and they're far better informed and more up-to-date on such matters than your precious ass-nibbling ( http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=130480983 ) mold-eaten dried-up old fruit Postol
icon url

DesertDrifter

04/13/17 8:24 PM

#268113 RE: Garden Rose #268105

Real scientists tend to stay out of politics as sticking to the best known truth is in the job description; the state of knowledge doesn't change whether it is believed or not by people with agendas.

Your demand that I list another scientist that supports the state of the knowledge is assinine... just look up any credible person that commented on it. it is really ignorant, for as even any junior high level science student would know, proving a null set is impossible; in other words your unsupported assertions could just as well be used to reach conclusions on the Kennedy Assassination. The burden is on you to produce a group of credible scientists that agree with your hero's assertions and "published" views based on some modicum of fact.

Aerial photogrammetry and photo-interpretation is something he acts like he invented or something... what a buffoon. The guy I learned from survived 100 missions as a WWII bomber crew bomb sight specialist who ended up at the University of Montana. Fred Gerlach was his name. Gee, you got me to do more bio, what a clever person you are. Your love for Postal is really huuuuge. Do you both get paid in rubles?