exactly. and if mr. postal is the paragon of scientific investigation, why is it that no other qualified academic has arrived at the same conclusions? Science has to be repeatable to be credible.
Please post any other comparable scientist that supports an opposing position? Can anyone find one????, please post. There are none. Most scientist know that the gov't findings are b.s. and can't publicly support it. It would be too embarrassing for them to do so.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
